Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Louise Esther Blenman
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Career Opportunities
    • Legal Internship
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • Directory
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non-Contentious Probate & Administration of Estates Rules
    • Court of Appeal Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appeals Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • JEI Programme
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » The Queen v Stephen Charles

    1
    ..
    THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT
    SAINT LUCIA
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL)
    CRIMINAL CASES NOS. SLUCRD 2011/2157, 2158 BETWEEN: THE QUEEN Claimant AND
    STEPHEN RAPHAEL CHARLES Defendant
    Appearances:
    Defendant in person
    Mr. Giovanni James Crown Counsel for the Crown
    2012: November 20
    JUDGMENT ON SENTENCING
    [1]. CUMBERBATCH, J. : On the night of Saturday 30th July, 2011 Chantal Gonzague (the virtual complainant) went to the Celebrity Sports Bar at Mongiraud. Whist there and on her way from the washroom the defendant tapped her on the buttocks. She objected to this gesture and an oral argument ensued between them. Later that evening the defendant again accosted her and during another oral argument he slapped and punched her in the face causing injuries thereto.
    2
    [2] The medical report of Dr. Aifaltrshe reveals as follows:
    “The Virtual Complainant sustained a major displacement of the upper maxillary bone. There was active bleeding with the upper lip being swollen with dislocation of the frenium. The extent of the injury ran from Canine to canine in the maxilla zone. In the doctor’s opinion the degree of force used had to be a powerful blow, which displaced the teeth that extend from canine to canine. The doctor adds that the degree of force would require maximum force from an adult. ”
    [3] On the 16th August 2012 the defendant was indicted by the Director of Public Prosecutions for the offence of causing grievous harm to the virtual complainant and at his arraignment he pleaded guilty as indicted.
    [4] THE HEARING
    After the defendant was allocuted, the court ordered a pre-sentence report be produced. This report revealed that the defendant is thirty-two (32) years old and at the time of this incident was employed as a tour guide. He’s had limited schooling and from age sixteen (16) was employed in various unskilled jobs. He commenced smoking cannabis at age seventeen (17) with the knowledge of his mother who herself was a consumer of this drug and never disapproved of the defendant’s use of same. He was also involved in a gang that sold cannabis. The defendant contends that though he smokes cannabis regularly, he’s not addicted to it and does not intend to discontinue its use.
    [5] There were mixed views of the defendant ‘from the community in which he resided. Some persons have described him as helpful and hardworking whilst others stated he has a tendency to threaten others and has displayed aggressive behavior.
    3
    [6] THE LAW
    The court will apply the classical principles of sentencing namely retribution, deterrence, prevention and rehabilitation to the case at bar. I have also found the following to be the aggravating and mitigating factors herein:
    AGGRAVATING FACTORS
    1.
    The severity of the injuries inflicted on the defendant;
    2.
    The degree of force used by the defendant, in punching and slapping the virtual complainant;
    3.
    The lack of remorse expressed by the defendant;
    4.
    The defendant portrayed an attitude of disregard and disrespect of and for the rights and dignity of virtual complainant, afemale;
    5.
    The defendant’s insistence that he would not discontinue his use of cannabis;
    6.
    The defendant’s refusal to accept counseling at the Bordelais Correctional Facility for anger management.
    MITIGATING FACTORS
    1. The defendant’s early guilty plea.
    I have considered and carried out a balancing exercise on the aggravating and mitigating factors in the context of the circumstances of this case and find that the aggravating factors significantly outweigh the mitigating ones.
    4
    [7] SENTENCE
    The defendant in his interview with the probation officer indicated that he is not repentant for hitting the virtual complainant in the manner in which he did. He contends that she provoked the conflict situation. He has however stated that he’s willing to pay compensation for the injuries caused to the virtual complainant.
    [8] I find that the arrogance of the defendant in refusing help for his drug use and uncontrollable anger to be absurd. The defendant, in his present condition, is a prime candidate for recidivism. I am further concerned about his misguided belief that he did nothing wrong by attacking and injuring the virtual complainant in the manner he did. The defendant offered to compensate the virtual complainant in the sLIm of seven thousand ($7000.00) dollars by monthly installments of two hundred ($200.00) dollars provided he is released from prison and acquires a job. No evidence was adduced by the defendant as to his certainty of obtaining employment which would enable him to compensate the virtual complainant in a timely manner or at all. I therefore find this offer of compensation to be no more than a pipe dream and totally unacceptable.
    [9] I find the actions by the defendant to be both brutal and heinous. The situation is made more egregious by his unrepentant attitude coupled with his ridiculous offer to compensate the virtual complainant provided he is released from Bordelais Correctional Facility to do so. The court must show its adherence by the sentence imposed for this kind of conduct. I further find that the defendant is in need of the appropriate counseling to come to terms with issues of gender equality, anger management and drug abuse. As such it is necessary for him to be confined for a suitable period of time to ensure that his successful rehabilitation.
    I
    5
    [10] The offence for which the defendant is convicted carries a maximum sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment. In the circumstances I find that a benchmark of six (6) years to be appropriate. will deduct two (2) years for his early guilty plea which is the sole mitigating factor herein. Accordingly the defendant is sentenced to four (4) years imprisonment. He will be credited for all time spent on remand whilst awaiting his trial. He shall receive counseling on drug abuse for his cannabis addiction and anger management.

    /the-queen-v-stephen-charles/
     Prev
    JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov
    Next 
    ECSC Newsletter – 1 – January – March 2013
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2021 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more