Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Louise Esther Blenman
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Gerard Farara
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Career Opportunities
    • Legal Internship
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • Directory
    • Transcript Requests
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non Contentious Probate Rules and Administration of Estates
    • Court of Appeal Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Court Proceedings Fees
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
      • Video Conferencing Protocols
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appeals Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • JEI Programme
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » Stephanie Anna James v Lennard Peter Moise

    1
    COMMONWEALTH OF DOMINICA
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
    SUIT NO. 37 OF 1996
    BETWEEN:
    STEPHANIE ANNA JAMES
    Claimant
    AND
    LENNARD PETER MOISE
    Defendant
    Appearances:
    Ms. Dawn Yearwood of Counsel for the Claimant

    Ms. Ronan A. David of Counsel for the Defendant

    21st November, 2001.

    DECISION: 4th December, 2001.

    JUDGEMENT
    [1] CHONG J:, Ag. The issues to be decided in this case are as follows:-
    (1) That the defendant at a certain place and in the presence of certain
    persons, did use the words to wit:” The only reason why your father left
    you that portion of land was because he was your man.”
    (2) Whether the said words, if said were capable of conveying a defamatory
    meaning and further that the said words were meant and understood to
    mean
    (3) (a) that the Claimant had a romantic relationship with her father;
    (4) that the Claimant had committed incest;
    (5) that the Claimant had been unchaste or had committed adultery.
    The significance of (b) and (c) above were to permit the Claimant’s clam to fall
    within the exception, wherein an action of slander will lie within proof of special
    damage.
    2
    [2] Issue No. 1 is purely a question of fact and based on the evidence I find as a fact
    that the Defendant at Petite Savanne in the presence of at least six persons did
    use the following words namely: “The only reason why our father left you the
    portion of land was because he was your man
    [3] This conclusion is fortified by the fact that when the Defendant was asked by the
    Claimant on two occasions if that is what he said, he said nothing and walked
    away.
    [4] Having found that the words complained of were in fact said, the second final
    issue to be decided is whether as a matter of law, the words complained of are
    capable of conveying a defamatory meaning and in so doing lowered the
    Claimant in the estimation of ordinary right thinking persons in the community of
    Petite Savanne.
    [5] In finding the legal answer to this issue, it is instructive to point out that the
    Defendant’s Defence was not that the words complained of did not or could not
    have the meaning ascribed to them by the Claimant, but that the Defendant did not
    use the words complained of, but used other wards namely: “It seems that when
    our father bought the land, you were with him.” and in his evidence in chief, “It
    seems you were there when he was sharing the land.” Clearly, it is the opinion of
    the court that Defendant’s Defence is somewhat tantamount common to an
    admission that the words complained of were capable of conveying defamatory
    meaning.
    [6] That aside and bearing in mind the local idiosyncrasy of Caribbean society such
    as Petite Savanne the words used by the Defendant and in particular the words,
    “Your man.” Given the context in which said words were uttered could only have
    conveyed the meaning ascribed to them by the Claimant that she had a romantic
    relationship with her father which was not of a desirable nature and unchaste.
    The Claimant has therefore satisfied the onus placed on her and has in the opinion
    of the Court prove that the words used by the Defendant were defamatory of the
    Claimant and lowered her in the estimation of the Ordinary right thinking persons
    of the village of Petite Savanne, and I so find.
    [7] By finding, as a matter of fact and law that the Claimant has proved her case of
    slander against the Defendant, there are two further issues that require the Court’s
    consideration namely:
    i. the damage to be awarded and
    ii whether there is need for an injunction.
    [8] Guided by the authorities submitted in the Court by Counsel for the Claimant, the
    Court is of the view based on the 1999, Dominican case of G.O.N. Emanuel and
    Theodoris Lawrence that an award of $3,000.00 in this case would not only be
    sufficient but adequate compensation for the injury suffered by the Claimant at the
    mouth of the Defendant.
    3
    [9] With regards to the issue of an injunction, the Claimant has not led any evidence
    to convince the Court that there is any reason to apprehend further repetition of
    the publication of the slander and for this reason I find no grounds for granting
    the injunction.
    [10] In conclusion therefore my order is as follows:
    1. Judgement for the Claimant in the sum of $3,000.00.
    2. Injunction refused
    3. Costs to be agreed or otherwise taxed.
    JUSTICE TYRONE CHONG
    HIGH COURT JUDGE

    /stephanie-anna-james-v-lennard-peter-moise/
     Prev
    STEPHANIE SEALES BY HER ATTORNEY ON RECORD EWART KING v LEON GRANT
    Next 
    AGATHA HENRY v EAGLE AIR SERVICES LTD
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2022 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more