Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Brief History of the Court
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Gerard Farara, KC
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Trevor Ward, KC
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • More…
      • Career Opportunities
      • Legal Internship
      • Transcript Requests
      • Directory
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • ECSC Court of Appeal Rules
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non Contentious Probate Rules and Administration of Estates
    • Family Proceedings Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Court Proceedings Fees
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
      • Video Conferencing Protocols
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • JEI History
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • Programmes Archive
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » Mitchell Acham v Walter E. Acham

    THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT

    ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA

     

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

    CLAIM NO: ANUHCV2009/0426

    BETWEEN:

     

    MITCHELL ACHAM

    Claimant

    AND

     

    WALTER E. ACHAM

     

    Defendant

    Appearances:

    Mr. Vere Bird Ill for the Claimant Mr. J. Martin for the Defendant

     

    2015: February 14

    February 19

     

    JUDGEMENT

    [1] Cottle, J.: Alphaeus Acham devised the residue of his estate to his sister Sarah D. Lake. There were two provisos to the gift. Firstly the “Wesson” Estate was not to be “sold, transferred or alienated out of the Acham family or the Lake family to the extent of the two sons of my sister to wit: Gerald H. Lake and Oscar D. Lake” and secondly the two nephews of the testator, Oscar Lake and Walter Acham were to be managers of the Wesson Estate. The Wesson Estate formed part of the residue of the testator’s estate.

    [2] Oscar Lake and Walter Acham were named as co-executors. Oscar Lake refused to act as manager of the estate. Walter Acham has been acting as manager. The claimant is a brother of the defendant. He is a member of the Acham family. He brings the present claim to compel the executor to distribute the estate in accordance with the will.

    [3] This entire claim turns on the interpretation of Clause 10 of the will or rather the two provisos to the residuary clause.

    [4] Counsel for the claimant says that provisos are conditions precedent.

    [5] It is common ground that Oscar Lake has refused to act as manager of Wesson Estate. The effect of this failure of a condition precedent is that the gift of the residue fails with respect to Wesson Estate, counsel for the claimant submits. As a consequence, he goes on, Wesson Estate now falls to be vested in the members of the Acham Family.

    [6] With respect to counsel I could see no reason to separate Wesson Estate from the rest of the residuary estate. If counsel is correct then all residuary gifts fail as they are all subject to the same conditions precedent.

    [7] The Learned authors of Williams on Wills at pp 344-346 offer useful guidance:

    ”Conditions precedent or subsequent. A condition is always either precedent or subsequent to the vesting of the interest given by the will, and whether it is a condition precedent or subsequent is determined by the construction of the will. If, upon the proper construction, there is no gift intended until the condition has been fulfilled, the condition is a condition precedent. Where a gift is contingent on an event, and until that event does take place there is no vested gift, the condition is a condition precedent. For a condition to be subsequent the gift must already have vested and the condition is intended to put an end to the gift. Where it is doubtful whether a condition is a condition precedent or subsequent, the court leans towards a construction which will hold it to be a condition subsequent, for that construction will lead to the early vesting of the gift and there is always a presumption in favour of early vesting. If the condition is void and is a condition precedent, the gift fails, but in the case of a condition subsequent the effect of the condition being void is that the gift takes effect free from the conditions.” 1

    [8] In my view, upon a proper construction of the clauses in issue, the conditions are clearly conditions subsequent. I find that the gift to Sarah Lake takes effect free from the conditions.

    [9] Additionally, had it been necessary I would have held the provisos to be void as repugnant to the interest already given to the beneficiary.

    [10] It is also worth pointing out that whether the Court concluded that the provisos were conditions precedent or subsequent mattered little to the claimant Upon no construction of the clause is it a gift to the Acham or Lake Family. The claimant is simply not a beneficiary. He has absolutely no interest in approaching the Court to have the executor act. The claim is dismissed. The claimant will pay the defendant’s prescribed costs in the sum of $7,500.00.

     

    Brian Cottle

    High Court Judge

     

    1 Williams on Wills 8th Edition

    Butterworths Law (2002)

    /mitchell-acham-v-walter-e-acham/
     Prev
    Marcus A Wide et al v S & J Limited et al
    Next 
    Dantzler Inc and Galloway Hardware Building Materials Ltd
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2023 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more