Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Brief History of the Court
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Gerard Farara, KC
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Trevor Ward, KC
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • More…
      • Career Opportunities
      • Legal Internship
      • Transcript Requests
      • Directory
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • ECSC Court of Appeal Rules
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non Contentious Probate Rules and Administration of Estates
    • Family Proceedings Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Court Proceedings Fees
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
      • Video Conferencing Protocols
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • JEI History
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • Programmes Archive
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » MARCIA SIMMONS v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

    1
    ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
    CIVIL SUIT NO. 547 OF 1999
    BETWEEN:
    MARCIA SIMMONS (The duly constituted
    Attorney on Record for Abraham Adams)
    Administratrix of the estate of Annie Adams, deceased
    Plaintiff
    and
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    Defendant
    Appearances:
    Mr Richard Williams for the Plaintiff
    Mr Donald Browne, Solicitor General, for the Defendant
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    2000: June 20, July 6, 13
    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
    JUDGMENT
    [1] MITCHELL, J: This was a land dispute between the heirs of Annie Adams, late of
    Union Island in the State of St Vincent and the Grenadines, and the Government
    of St Vincent. It involves approximately one acre of land in the town of Clifton in
    Union Island on which land the government has built a Fisheries Complex. The
    heirs claim that they and their ancestor Annie Adams had long owned the land
    prior to the construction.
    [2] The proceedings commenced by an originating summons issued on 8 November
    1999. The summons was supported by an affidavit of the same date of the
    Plaintiff and to which affidavit were attached a number of tax receipts and other
    documents. By the summons the Plaintiff claimed the following reliefs:
    2
    (1) a declaration that the Plaintiff is the lawful owner of one acre more or less
    of land situate at Clifton Union Island upon which the Crown has
    constructed a fisheries complex;
    (2) a declaration that the Plaintiff is entitled to possession of the parcel of land
    being one acre more or less situate at Clifton Union Island;
    (3) a declaration that the Defendant’s title, if any, has been extinguished by
    operation of the Limitation Act Cap 90 of the Laws of St Vincent and the
    Grenadines;
    (4) mesne profits from January 1993 until possession is delivered up;
    (5) alternatively, damages in the sum of $2,000,000.00;
    (6) damages for trespass;
    (7) costs;
    (8) such further or other relief.
    [3] The Defendant entered an appearance on 9 December 1999, and an affidavit in
    reply was sworn by Clifford Williams and filed on 17 May 2000. By directions
    given on 18 May 2000 pursuant to Order 28 rule 4 of the Rules of the Supreme
    Court, it was determined that the matter would be tried in open court on 20 June
    2000 on affidavit as well as oral evidence. Further affidavits were sworn and filed
    on behalf of the Plaintiff by her previous solicitor, Sylvester Raymond Cadette, on
    8 June 2000, and by the Plaintiff on 20 June 2000.
    [4] When the matter came up for trial on 20 June, the court heard testimony from
    Marcia Simmons, Sylvester Raymond Cadette, George Brown, and Dexter
    Gellizeau for the Plaintiff. Giving evidence for the Defendant was the Chief
    3
    Surveyor for St Vincent, Mr Clifford Williams. He put in the original survey plan of
    1912 for the eastern part of Union Island, which includes the area in dispute. At
    the conclusion of the case an amendment to the claim by the Plaintiff was allowed
    to add a further paragraph of relief claimed as follows:
    (9) an order for possession of the parcel of land;
    [5] The evidence for the Plaintiffs was to the effect that they had been the owners of
    the land for some 70 years prior to the Crown going into possession in the year
    1993 and constructing the Fisheries Complex on it. The Crown’s only objection to
    their claim was that neither Annie Adams nor her heirs had a deed for the land.
    Having heard the evidence, in particular of Mr Williams, I am satisfied that neither
    the Government of St Vincent nor its citizens are well served by the present
    system of land titles in St Vincent. Land titles in St Vincent are in theory based on
    common law deeds. There are two defects in that system immediately apparent to
    anyone who has had to adjudicate over land disputes in St Vincent. First, the
    possession of a deed in St Vincent and the Grenadines is no guarantee of proof of
    ownership of a parcel of land. It is not unusual to find two or three persons with
    different deeds relating to the ownership of the same parcel of land. Secondly, the
    lack of a deed is no impediment in St Vincent and the Grenadines to claiming
    successfully to hold legal title to a parcel of land. Most land in St Vincent appears
    to be held without any title document of any kind. It is for the above reasons that
    most islands in the West Indies have long ago given up the system of land
    ownership based on common law deeds. There is a real social need in St Vincent
    and the Grenadines for a modern system of registered ownership of land titles.
    [6] Land titles to parcels in Union Island should not be in controversy. This island was
    purchased by the Crown in 1910 from private hands and was immediately
    surveyed into lots with established boundaries, and the lots sold out to private
    persons. The original survey maps still exist. Each lot is numbered, and the
    boundaries exactly known. The original and subsequent purchasers should have
    4
    no difficulty in establishing their boundaries and their titles. I am satisfied,
    however, that many of the purchasers from the Crown have never received their
    deeds, and that in Union Island too, as on mainland St Vincent, the absence of a
    deed is no proof of lack of title, nor is the holding of a deed by an original owner
    any proof of present day title to a parcel of land.
    [7] The overwhelming evidence, which I accept, is that Mrs Annie Adams and, after
    her, her sons have been in possession of the parcel of land in question for over 70
    years before the Crown took possession of it and constructed a Fisheries Complex
    on it. To itemise some of the evidence which I accept:
    (1) The Revenue Office in Union Island is situate across the street from the
    parcel of land. The tax receipts for land taxes on Union Island bear a
    number that exactly locates the parcel of land for which it is paid. The
    Plaintiffs produced testimony and tax receipts to establish that since at
    least about the year 1948 they have been paying land taxes for the parcel
    of land. The receipts in evidence in this case relate to the parcel of land in
    question and none other. Not a single government officer from the tax
    office in Union Island past or present came to dispute the claim of the
    Plaintiffs to have paid land tax since at least 1948 for the parcel of land in
    dispute. I have no doubt that the revenue officers were all well aware of
    the ownership of the parcel of land by the heirs of Annie Adams when the
    Government set out to construct the Fisheries Complex on the land in the
    year 1993.
    (2) Very importantly, underlying everything else, was the direct evidence of
    the witnesses Sylvester Raymond Cadette, and George Brown, both with
    Union Island connections, who knew Annie Adams and her occupation
    and reputed ownership of the parcel in question over many years. George
    Brown, in particular, may have been 82 years of age, but his memory was
    crystal clear. Both of these witnesses were unshaken in their testimony of
    the undisputed and unbroken ownership, possession and use of the
    5
    parcel of land in dispute by Annie Adams and after her death by her two
    sons.
    (3) After the death of Annie Adams in 1979, her sons were in possession of
    the parcel of land. It was well known and accepted in Union Island that
    they owned the land. When lawyer Emmanuel Fatima Adams, now
    deceased, wished to do a business on the land, he entered into an
    agreement in 1986 with Abraham Adams, Annie’s son who resided in the
    USA, to lease it. Emmanuel Fatima Adams subsequently built a building
    on the land on which he operated a bar and variety store. That building
    was still on the land when Government came to build on it in 1993.
    Government paid the heirs of lawyer Emmanuel Fatima Adams
    compensation for the value of the building and they dismantled the
    building and took it away. The relevant government officers must have
    enquired and discovered how lawyer Adams came to be allowed to put a
    building on the land, even assuming they had not known before who the
    owner of the land was. The Chief Surveyor, who was the only witness
    testifying for the Crown, admitted knowing that Annie Adams and her heirs
    had some interest in the land, but said he had assumed they held only a
    leasehold interest. But, the tax rolls of Union Island would have shown
    otherwise. You do not pay land and house tax in St Vincent and the
    Grenadines for land you rent, only for land you own. Those tax rolls have
    recently gone up in flames when the Revenue Office burned down in
    1995. The records could not be produced at the trial. I am satisfied that
    they existed at the time of the entry by Government onto the lands to
    construct the building in 1993, and that the records, if they had been
    available, would have showed the Heirs of Annie Adams to hold title to the
    land in dispute.
    (4) The Chief Surveyor produced an original survey plan of 1912 for that part
    of Union Island that included the land in dispute. This plan showed the
    ownership of the parcel of land, originally known as Parcel A, which was
    then much larger than it now is, to be in the Crown. On the plan, the
    6
    entire Parcel A was marked as being owned by the Crown. The Chief
    Surveyor admitted that in the years since 1912 other parts of the Parcel A
    had been sold by the Crown to private owners. Their purchases had not
    been marked off on the plan in evidence. The plan still showed the
    original ownership of all of Parcel A as being in the Crown. The plan was
    worthless to prove who at this present time or at any time subsequently to
    the year 1912 owned any part of Parcel A. A current working map from
    the Lands and Surveys Department showing current ownership of lands in
    that part of Union Island might have been more helpful in this matter. In a
    negative sense, all that this plan went to show was that the claim of the
    Plaintiffs to have acquired title to the land sometime after 1926 but not to
    have received a deed to it was not disproved.
    [8] The Plaintiffs wrote to the Attorney General, copied to the Chief Surveyor and
    others, immediately upon the Crown going into possession of the land in dispute in
    1993. Despite the fact that the Crown officers were well aware that the Crown did
    not have clear title to the land, they persisted in constructing the Fisheries
    Complex without negotiating with the Plaintiffs. No doubt, the project was an
    important one for the Government and for the people of Union Island. But, the
    relevant government officers took the risk that the now elderly sons of Annie
    Adams, residing overseas as they both are, would not trouble to pursue their
    rights. Unfortunately for those officers and for the Government of St Vincent and
    the Grenadines, the sons of Annie Adams have pursued their rights. The court
    finds that the parcel of land in question belongs to the Plaintiffs, and the
    Government will have to pay compensation to the Plaintiffs for its wrongful seizure
    of their land for the construction of the Fisheries Complex.
    [9] The amount of compensation is not the issue before me today. The Plaintiffs
    brought some evidence that the parcel in dispute had a 1993 value of
    $871,200.00, and they have asked for $2,000,000.00 compensation. I am not
    satisfied with the quality of that evidence. The Crown disputes that valuation and
    7
    suggests it could be a quarter of the amount claimed by the Plaintiffs. I am not
    satisfied with the quality of that evidence either. There is also some reason to
    believe that the Fisheries Complex is built partly on the Plaintiff’s portion of Parcel
    A, and partly on the Crown’s foreshore adjacent to Parcel A. The Plaintiff’s have
    no interest in the foreshore, and are not entitled to compensation for any part of
    the Complex that has been placed on the foreshore. A survey still has to be done
    to discover exactly what it is that the Plaintiffs own on Parcel A. The question of
    damages will be a matter for a subsequent trial, if the parties do not come to some
    agreement on compensation. I have considered making an order for possession
    in favour of the Plaintiffs as requested by the amendment to the Summons granted
    at the stage of addresses. Such a remedy seems at this time a bit drastic. If the
    Crown does not do the proper thing, and promptly commence proceedings to
    acquire the land and to compensate the Plaintiffs for their unlawfully confiscated
    property, an order for possession may be at a future time an appropriate wake up
    call.
    [10] There will be judgment for the Plaintiffs as follows:
    (1) The Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that they are the lawful owners
    of one acre of land more or less situate at Clifton Union Island part of
    Parcel A on the official Survey Plan of 1912.
    (2) The Plaintiffs are entitled to damages for trespass to be assessed if not
    agreed.
    (3) The Plaintiffs are entitled to an amount of compensation for the value of
    the land wrongfully taken away from them as of the date of payment of
    compensation at an amount to be assessed if not agreed.
    (4) The Plaintiffs are entitled to their costs to be taxed if not agreed.
    (5) Liberty to apply
    8
    I D MITCHELL, QC
    High Court Judge

    https://www.eccourts.org/marcia-simmons-v-the-attorney-general/
     Prev
    EMELIUS BARNWELL v THOMAS JOHN
    Next 
    Pavlo Lazarenko et al v The Office Of National Drug And Money Laundering Control Policy
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2023 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more