Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Brief History of the Court
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Gerard Farara, KC
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Trevor Ward, KC
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • More…
      • Career Opportunities
      • Legal Internship
      • Transcript Requests
      • Directory
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • ECSC Court of Appeal Rules
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non Contentious Probate Rules and Administration of Estates
    • Family Proceedings Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Court Proceedings Fees
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
      • Video Conferencing Protocols
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • JEI History
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • Programmes Archive
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » Isula Shearman v Devon Glasgow et al

    EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT
    SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

    CLAIM NO. SVGHCV 2011/0259

    BETWEEN:

    ISULA SHEARMAN
    Claimant

    and

    [1] DEVON GLASGOW
    [2] PETER CAMPBELL
    Defendants

    Before:
    Ms. Agnes Actie Master [Ag.]

    Appearances:
    Mr. Joseph Delves for the Claimant


    2013: November 22;
    2014: January 10


    JUDGMENT

    [1] ACTIE, M [AG.]: This is a matter for setting aside of a default judgment pursuant to CPR 13. 2.

    [2] By claim form with statement of claim filed on 20th June 2011 and an amended statement of claim the claimant claims against the defendants for damages arising out of a vehicular accident.

    [3] The claimant was injured on 27th September 2010 when the motor vehicle she was driving was struck in the rear by a passenger van driven by the first defendant. The vehicle was owned by the second defendant.

    [4] Mr. Rodwell Alexander a bailiff of the high court deposed to two affidavits of personal service of the claim form, acknowledgment of service and amended claim form on the second named defendant.

    [5] Both affidavits were defective as they failed to comply with all the requirements of CPR Rule 5.5.

    [6] The claimant by application filed on 18th November 2011 made a request for entry of judgment in default against the second defendant.

    [7] The Registrar by order dated 18th November 2012 granted judgment in default of defence in terms “No defence having been filed by the second named defendant the defendants to pay an amount to be decided by the court on assessment pursuant to part 12.10(1)(b)” .

    [8] The claimant by notice of application filed on 31st July 2013 applied and directions were given for assessment of damages by the court.

    [9] Upon further review it was discovered that the claim form, amended claim form and statement of claim were never served on the first defendant.

    THE LAW

    [10] CPR 12.5 provides the conditions to be satisfied for entry of default judgment for failure to defend the claim. Proof of service of the claim form must be established before the court can grant judgment in default of defence.
    CPR 12.5(1) states:-
    “The court office at the request of the claimant must enter judgment for failure to defend if:-
    (a) (i) the claimant proves service of the claim form and statement of claim; or
    (b) … .”

    [11] The court must be satisfied that there has been proof of valid service where an application for default judgment is made. In the absence of valid service of the clam a claimant is not entitled to judgment in default of appearance or defence.

    [12] CPR 2000 12.9 provides for default of judgment against more than one defendants.
    “(1) A claimant may apply for default judgment on a claim for money or a claim for delivery of goods against one or two or more defendants and proceed with the claim against the other defendants.

    (2) If a claimant applies for a default judgment against one of two or more defendants then if the claim:

    (a) can be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants:-
    (i) the court may enter judgment against that defendant; and
    (ii) the claimant can continue proceedings against the other defendants, or

    (b) cannot be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants, the court –
    (i) may not enter judgment against that defendant; and
    (ii) must deal with the application at the same time as it disposes of the claim against the other defendants.”

    [13] The Court may enter judgment in default against one defendant where the claim is against more than one defendant but only if the claim can be dealt with separately from the claim against the other defendants. The claim herein is for damages in negligence against the driver of a motor vehicle owned by the second defendant. The action against the second defendant, the owner of the vehicle, rests on the liability of the driver, the first defendant. The first defendant who is the main tortfeasor has not been given an opportunity to give his version of facts either by admission or filing a defence. The claim therefore cannot be separated in the circumstances. Further the Registrar does not have the jurisdiction to determine whether the claim can be dealt with separately where there is more than one defendant. Whereas Rule 12. 4 and Rule 12.5 state that the “Court Office” at the request of the claimant must enter judgment for failure to file an acknowledgment of service or failure to defend respectively. The language in Rule 12.9 is dissimilar to Rule 12.4 and Rule 12.5. Rule 12.9 states that “The Court” may enter a judgment against one of two or more defendants if the claim can be dealt with separately. “The Court” in such an instance means a Judge of the High Court or a Master in Chambers but does not include the Registrar.

    [14] The entry of judgment in default by the Registrar against the 2nd defendant is erroneous, irregular and cannot stand.

    [15] CPR Part 13 provides for setting aside or varying default judgment. Rule 13.2 provides for cases where the court must (my emphasis) set aside default judgments. The Rule provides;
    “(1) The Court must set aside a judgment entered under part 12 if judgment was wrongly entered because of:-

    (a) a failure to file an acknowledgment of service, any of the conditions in Rule 12.4 was not satisfied; or

    (b) judgment for failure to defend, any of the conditions in rule 12.5 was not satisfied.

    (2) The Court may set aside judgement under this rule on or without application.”

    [19] CPR 13.2 refers to judgment being ‘wrongly entered” i.e, the judgment being irregular. The Court must set aside the wrongly entered judgment.

    ORDER 
    

    [20] For the foregoing reasons and pursuant to CPR 13.2 the judgment in default of appearance against the second defendant granted by the Registrar on 18th November 2012 being irregular is hereby set aside.

    Agnes Actie
    Master [Ag.]

    /isula-shearman-v-devon-glasgow-et-al/
     Prev
    Peter Jn Marie et al v Laurima Lowrie et al
    Next 
    Randy Josiah v AMW Welding Industrial Supplies Ltd
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2023 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more