Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
  • About Us
    • Brief History of the Court
    • Court Overview
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Past Chief Justices
      • Sir Hugh Rawlins
      • Sir Brian George Keith Alleyne
      • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Adrian Saunders
      • Hon. Sir Charles Michael Dennis Byron
      • Rt. Hon. Sir Vincent Floissac
      • Honourable Sir Lascelles Lister Robotham
      • More..
        • Hon. Neville Algernon Berridge
        • Sir Neville Peterkin
        • Sir Maurice Herbert Davis
        • Justice P. Cecil Lewis
        • Sir Allen Montgomery Lewis
    • Judicial Officers
      • Justices of Appeal
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Davidson Kelvin Baptiste
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Mario Michel
        • Her Ladyship, the Hon. Justice Gertel Thom
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Paul Anthony Webster [Ag.]
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Gerard Farara, KC
        • His Lordship, the Hon. Justice Trevor Ward, KC
      • High Court Judges
      • Masters
    • Court of Appeal Registry
    • Court Connected Mediation
      • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Mediation Publications
    • More…
      • Career Opportunities
      • Legal Internship
      • Transcript Requests
      • Directory
  • Judgments
    • Privy Council
    • Caribbean Court of Justice
    • Court Of Appeal Judgments
    • High Court Judgments
    • Digests of Decisions
    • Country
      • Anguilla
      • Antigua & Barbuda
      • Grenada
      • Montserrat
      • Saint Kitts and Nevis
      • Saint lucia
      • Saint Vincent & The Grenadines
      • Territory of the Virgin Islands
    • Year
      • 1972 – 1990
        • 1972
        • 1973
        • 1975
        • 1987
        • 1989
        • 1990
      • 1991 – 2000
        • 1991
        • 1992
        • 1993
        • 1994
        • 1995
        • 1996
        • 1997
        • 1998
        • 1999
        • 2000
      • 2001 – 2010
        • 2001
        • 2002
        • 2003
        • 2004
        • 2005
        • 2006
        • 2007
        • 2008
        • 2009
        • 2010
      • 2011 – 2019
        • 2011
        • 2012
        • 2013
        • 2014
        • 2015
        • 2016
        • 2017
        • 2018
        • 2019
    • Judgment Focus
  • Sittings & Notices
    • Schedule of Sittings
    • Court of Appeal Sittings
    • Chamber Hearing (Appeals)
    • Case Management (Appeals)
    • High Court Sittings
    • Status Hearings
    • Special Sittings
    • Notices
  • Court Procedures & Rules
    • ECSC Court of Appeal Rules
    • ECSC (Sittings of the Court) Rules, 2014
    • Civil Procedure Rules [WEB]
    • ECSC Civil Procedure Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to Nov 2015]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2014
      • ECSC Civil Procedure (Amendment) (No.2) Rules
      • Civil Procedure Rules 2000 [Amendments to May 2014]
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
      • Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2011
    • ECSC Criminal Procedure Rules
      • Criminal Procedure Rules SI No. 22 of 2015
    • ECSC Sentencing Guidelines
    • Non Contentious Probate Rules and Administration of Estates
    • Family Proceedings Rules
    • More..
      • Election Petition Rules
      • Legal Profession Disciplinary Procedure Rules (St. Lucia)
      • Code Of Judicial Conduct
      • Court Forms
        • Introduction of E-Filing
        • BVI Commercial Division E-Filing
        • Court-Connected Mediation Practice Direction Forms
      • Court Proceedings Fees
      • SILK Application Procedure
      • Practice Directions
      • Practice Notes
      • Video Conferencing Protocols
  • News & Publications
    • ECSC Media Gallery
    • Annual Reports
    • Appointments
    • Press Releases
    • Papers & Presentation
      • Opening of the Law Year Addresses
    • Tributes
  • E-Litigation
    • E-Litigation Portal
    • E-Litigation Instructional Videos
    • ECSC E-Litigation Portal User Information
    • Electronic Litigation Filing and Service Procedure Rules
    • Notices of Commencement
    • E-Litigation Publications
  • J.E.I
    • JEI History
    • Structure of JEI
    • JEI Chairman
    • Mandate, Objectives, Standards
    • Programmes Archive
      • Conferences
      • Programmes & Projects
      • Symposiums
      • Training
      • Workshops
    • Upcoming Activities
more
    • About Us
    • Meet the Chief Justice
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Mediation
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • Saved for Later
 Home  E-Litigation Portal
  •  Court Procedures And Rules
    • Civil Procedure Rules
    • Court Forms
    • Election Petition Rules
    • Practice Directions
  •  Judgments
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
    •  Digest of Decisions
  •  Sittings
    •  All
    •  Court of Appeal
    •  High Court
  • Sign In
    
    Minimize Search Window
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Category {{SelectedFilters.length}}x Categories 
    •       {{item.title}} {{selectedCountries.length}}x Countries Country 
    •       {{item.title}} Filter By Year {{selectedOptions.length}}x Options 
    
    Sorry can't find what you're looking for try adjusting your search terms
    Appeal
    {{doc._source.post_title}}
    Page {{indexVM.page}} of {{indexVM.pageCount}}
    pdf
    Home » Judgments » High Court Judgments » Ginger Villa Incorporated v Caribbean Development (Antigua) Limited

    Ginger Villa Incorporated v Caribbean Development (Antigua) Limited

    1
    EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT
    ANTIGUA & BARBUDA
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
    CLAIM NO. ANUHCV 2012/0608
    GINGER VILLA INCORPORATED
    Claimant
    and
    CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENTS (Antigua) LIMITED
    Defendant
    Before:
    Ms. Agnes Actie Master [Ag.]
    Appearances:
    Ms. C. Debra Burnette with Ms. Stacy Ann Osbourne – Saunders of counsel for the
    claimant
    Ms. Leslie- Ann Brissett George of counsel for defendant


    2014: January 13, 31;


    REASONS FOR DECISION
    [1] ACTIE, M. [Ag.]: The defendant by notice of application with affidavit in support
    filed on 6th January 2014, applied to the court for an extension of time to file written
    submissions. The matter came up for determination where I refused the
    application and to provide written reasons for my decision, which I now do.
    Background
    [2] The claimant by notice of application filed on 15th October 2012, applied for a
    declaration pursuant to CPR Part 9.7 that the court ought not to exercise its
    jurisdiction in the matter. The application came up for determination on
    11th October 2013, where the Master directed the parties to file and exchange
    2
    submissions on or before 4th November 2013, and adjourned the matter to 3rd
    December 2013.
    [3] On 29th November 2013, the applicant/claimant applied for an extension of time to
    file its submissions and to deem the submissions filed on 29th November 2013, to
    be properly filed. The Master by Order dated 3rd December 2013, granted the
    claimants’ application and made the following Order:
    “ORDER
    “UPON THIS MATTER coming up for hearing of an application of the
    claimant for extension of time to file witness statements filed on 29th
    November 2013 and the application of the Defendant filed on 15th October
    2012;
    AND UPON HEARING Counsel for the claimant who advises that the
    application was remitted for hearing to the Master by the Court of Appeal;
    AND the Defendant indicating that she was only recently retained in the
    matter and would wish to have the opportunity to file submissions;
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
    1. The application filed on 29th November 2013 is granted as per
    approved draft order on file.
    2. The defendant is to file and serve submissions in relation to the
    application fled on 15th October 2012 on or before 17th December
    2013.
    3. The application will come for determination on the 13th January
    2014 whether or not submissions of the defendant have been
    filed.
    4. Defendant to have carriage of the Order”.
    [4] The defendant failed to file the submissions as directed by the Learned Master.
    By notice of application with affidavit in support filed on 8th January 2014, the
    defendant applied for an extension of time to file submissions, to deem the
    submissions filed on the even date properly filed pursuant to CPR 26.1 and relief
    from sanctions pursuant to CPR 26.8. Counsel also filed a notice of acting on the
    even date.
    3
    [5] The claimant by letter dated 10th January 2014 opposed the defendant’s
    application for an extension of time.
    THE LAW
    [6] The granting of an extension of time is an element of discretion to be exercised in
    keeping with the overriding objective in dealing with cases justly and expeditiously.
    The Rule governing extension of time exists in Rule 26.1(2)(k) of the Civil
    Procedure Rules 2000 (“CPR 2000”) which states:
    “26.1(2) Except where the these rules provide otherwise, the court may –
    (k) extend or shorten the time for compliance with any rule, practice
    direction, order or direction of the court even if the application for an
    extension is made after the time for compliance has passed.”
    [7] The Rule is silent on the criteria to be taken into account by the court in exercising
    its discretion in granting the extension of time for compliance with any rule or
    practice direction. The court in such circumstance is guided by the overriding
    objective of the rules to enable the court to deal with cases justly and
    expeditiously. Rule 1.2 states the court must seek to give effect to the overriding
    objective when it (a) – exercises any discretion given to it by the Rules; or (b)
    interprets any rule.”
    [8] Sir Denis Byron CJ in John Cecil Rose v Anne Marie Uralis Rose1, on an
    application for an extension of time said;
    “Granting the extension of time is a discretionary power of the Court which
    will be exercised in favour of the applicant for good and substantial
    reasons. The matters which the court will consider in the exercise of its
    discretion (1) the length of the delay; (2) the reasons for the delay; (3) the
    chances of success if the extension is granted and (4) the degree of
    prejudice if the Application is granted’ .
    1 Saint Lucia Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2003 (delivered 22ndSeptember 2003, unreported).
    4
    [9] Her Ladyship, the Honorable Madame Justice Pereira as she then was in Carleen
    Pemberton v Mark Brantley2, states:
    “that the discretionary power, although a very broad one, cannot be
    exercised in a vacuum or on a whim, but must be exercised judicially in
    accordance with well-established principles. Overall, in the exercise of the
    discretion the court must seek to give effect to the overriding objective
    which is to ensure that justice is done as between the parties. At
    paragraph 13 she states that much depends on the nature of the failure,
    the consequential effect, weighing the prejudice, and of course the length
    of the delay, and whether there is any good reason for it which makes it
    excusable. This is by no means an exhaustive list of all the factors which
    may have to be considered in the exercise”.
    [10] The principles enunciated in Rose v Rose and Carleen Pemberton were also
    adopted by Edwards JA in the case of C.O. Williams Construction (St. Lucia)
    Limited v Inter-Island Dredging Co. Ltd.3
    Analysis
    [11] The Order of the Master directed the defendant to file its submissions on
    17th December 2013. The application for the extension of time was filed on
    7th January 2014, 21 days after the date ordered by the Learned Master. The
    applicant in the affidavit in support deposed that the reason for non-compliance
    was due to the fact that counsel was only retained and instructed on
    30th December 2013, and had not properly brought herself on the record in
    accordance with Rule 63. The applicant further states that the inability to prepare
    the submissions after the deadline date had passed was due to the intervening
    court holidays and office closure.
    [12] I find the reasons given by the defendant untenable. Firstly the Learned Master in
    granting the extension to file submissions took the fact that counsel had recently
    been retained into consideration when she states in the preamble to the Order;
    “AND the Defendant indicating that she was only recently retained in the matter
    2 Saint Christopher and Nevis HCVAP2011/009 (delivered 14th October 2011, unreported).
    3 Saint Lucia Civil Appeal No. HCVAP2011/017(delivered) 19th March 2012
    5
    and would wish to have the opportunity to file submissions”. Secondly, the
    defendant counsel placed herself on the record on 3rd December 2013 and the
    Master accepted counsel as representing the defendant when she ordered
    counsel to have carriage of the order. To date counsel has not filed the order as
    was directed by the Learned Master which shows a pattern of delays and noncompliance
    by the defendant. The defendant was directed to serve the
    submissions on 17th December 2013 in advance of the Christmas holidays which
    goes against the excuse that the closure of the office after the holidays contributed
    to the delay.
    [13] The defendant has not convinced the court that it should exercise its discretion in
    favor of granting the defendant an extension of time. The order of the Learned
    Master stated that the application would be determined whether or not
    submissions of the defendant had been filed and will proceed accordingly.
    ORDER
    [14] For the foregoing reasons the application of the defendant for an extension of time
    to file submissions and for relief from sanctions is refused.
    Agnes Actie
    Master [Ag.]

    /ginger-villa-incorporated-v-caribbean-development-antigua-limited/
     Prev
    Winston Hinkson v Elvira Bull Nee Martelly
    Next 
    Peter Jn Marie et al v Laurima Lowrie et al
    Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court

    2nd Floor Heraldine Rock Building
    Waterfront
    P.O. Box 1093
    Castries
    Saint Lucia
    T: +1 758 457 3600
    E: offices@eccourts.org

    • About Us
      • Court Overview
      • Career Opportunities
      • Directory
      • Privacy Policy
    • Judgments
      • Court Of Appeal
      • High Court
    • Sittings
      • Chamber Hearing
      • Court of Appeal
      • High Court
    • News & Updates
      • Appointments
      • Press Releases
    • Civil Procedure Rules
      • Court Forms
      • Practice Directions
    © 2023 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved

    Submit your email address and name to subscribe for email notifcations.

    [email-subscribers-advanced-form id="1"]
    Bookmark
    Remove Item
    Sign in to continue
    or

    Bookmarked Items
    •  Home
    • Judgments
    • Sittings
    •  News
    •  more